Author Topic: SHOULD TECHS UPHOLD RULES (Read 7758 times)

Pinecrest · « **Reply #15 on:** May 31, 2007, 09:35:05 PM »

Quote from: midamerica on May 31, 2007, 08:46:35 PM

Pinecrest- In short I do not cheat - AT ALL!!
Although that may sound like B.S. it is true and there is a reason for it.
We cannot rent a ride, or sign a sponsor knowing that the car may not pass tech. or miss a show.
I have always looked at it this way. If you have to cheat to win the only person your beating is yourself.

If you say so I believe you . How many wins and championships in the last few years Mid ?

I am surprised that you think Hanley and Biederman were only beating them selves all those years .

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25406#msg25406

CanadianRacingOnline.com · « **Reply #15 on:** May 31, 2007, 09:35:05 PM »

MID · « **Reply #16 on:** May 31, 2007, 09:53:36 PM »

Good point...you won this one Pinecrest !!

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25407#msg25407

Puppydogs · « **Reply #17 on:** June 01, 2007, 07:06:44 AM »

You know guys this is about whether Techs should uphold the rules of the track. It's not about cheating, there are people who cheat outright to win, then there are those that push the envolope, this whole thing was about whether the tech should have upheld the rules. To those that outright cheat, I hope you get caught. It's too bad the track didn't have the rule, you cheat once, dq'd and warned, you cheat twice, suspended for a race, get caught the third time, you are gone for the season. But then of course, I wonder if the Techs would uphold that one. But that's just my opinion

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25417#msg25417

CanadianRacingOnline.com · « **Reply #17 on:** June 01, 2007, 07:06:44 AM »

Scooter · « **Reply #18 on:** June 01, 2007, 06:50:11 PM »

If you are a good driver''you don't have to cheat!!.....so i guess for those who have to cheat''are not good drivers....There that sums it up!!!!..

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25438#msg25438

taj 2 · « **Reply #19 on:** June 13, 2007, 06:11:36 PM »

Food for thought. My opinion only but, maybe the question should be "are the tech officials aloud to uphold the rules at St. Onge speedway?"

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25772#msg25772

joeyw · « **Reply #20 on:** June 13, 2007, 07:16:53 PM »

The only thing they tech at barrie is to make sure your in dash radio gets KICX F.M., you let 2 go now you better let them all go .

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25775#msg25775

hellothere · « **Reply #21 on:** June 13, 2007, 09:14:15 PM »

what does that mean taj what rules are u talkin about, i thought the name change was a farce???

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25778#msg25778

Swaybar · « **Reply #22 on:** June 14, 2007, 03:05:36 PM »

Prime example of how Barrie Officials do not uphold the results from tech and it's not the tech guys. For the 2nd time this year a thundercar driver has been caught cheaking, and gotten away with it because his brother is an offical (cough double 00 cough). First time he got caught with too big of valve springs and got away with it - even though they dq'ed the 24 Thundercar for the exact same springs that night. Hmmm 1 got dq'ed, 1 got away with it, both for the same thing. Nope no favorites at Barrie, then last weekend he got caught for have lead on this car and got it reversed again. I guess he was freaking out when they were going to dq him and was screaming that he wanted the #44 car torn down right then cause he was going to get to much of a points lead on him. But big brother seemed to make it all go away for him - cause isn't that what big brothers are for?

I can't believe they can even keep the guys they have working in tech there because what they find is just over ruled if they are a favorite

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25789#msg25789

barriefan1 · « **Reply #23 on:** June 14, 2007, 06:05:49 PM »

Quote from: Swaybar on June 14, 2007, 03:05:36 PM

then last weekend he got caught for have lead on this car and got it reversed again. I guess he was freaking out when they were going to dq him and was screaming that he wanted the #44 car torn down right then cause he was going to get to much of a points lead on him.

I'm sorry. What are you trying to say here. Seriously. I don't understand a word of it.

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25792#msg25792

hellothere · « **Reply #24 on:** June 14, 2007, 09:26:51 PM »

here we go again, swaybar, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.the 00 car did not have valve springs like the 24 not even close..and if you knew so much you would know that steve told the tech man to dq 00 if he found anything illegal i was standing right there when he said it. brad went and strung the car to be sure there was no lead in the car, so state only the facts and dont post it unless you know the facts, it misleads people and causes more problems, and if that car is so cheated why doesnt someone put the money down to protest it? mansome people just state things they dont know anything about...

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25799#msg25799

taj 2 · « **Reply #25 on:** June 14, 2007, 11:34:59 PM »

I believe your off swaybar, but not by much. That night the 24 car was dq'd, the 00 was running a crate motor."Rumour has it" their was shimmed valve springs in it. Under the crate motor rules, that would require a 12 calendar month suspension. The following week the horsepower motor was installed and he has not beat the 44 since.You don't think Barrie Speedway would knowingly spit in the face of the other drivers of new generation cars with crate motors by letting them away with that, do you?

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25801#msg25801

flybyya8 · « **Reply #26 on:** June 15, 2007, 10:33:09 AM »

Somthing has to be done cause theres no way either of them are legal. Did anybody notice that 44 on restarts, looks like he was shot out of a cannon!!.

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25805#msg25805

hellothere · « **Reply #27 on:** June 15, 2007, 11:45:03 AM »

TAJ "rumour has it that you are with the #2 thunder car and that you got caught cheating with a cheated center link from Reynolds" and where still aloud to race last sat. I think that tech should disqualify the entire field and there will be no thunders, wadda ya think??l

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25806#msg25806

taj 2 · « **Reply #28 on:** June 15, 2007, 05:35:26 PM »

I'll clear up your rumour "hello there", I own the 2 car. Our team didnot get caught cheating, I aproached the tech department, as I do anytime we make a change on our car, and had them look at or new front end parts. Kevin put a great centre link in the car when it was built. As you may have witnessed two weeks ago we had a wreck involving the 97 & 92 cars ,bending the link for the third time. Thanks to Greg at Simcoe Auto we got one from an 81 Malibu. Thats why I had it checked because I did not know if it was the same as a 86 Monte Carlo. I'm a carpenter, not a mechanic, just ask anyone who knows me. I love my nephew but when it comes to parts for that car I trust Greg from simcoe, the guys at bayside, Billy Howard and Brad Richmond on how legal a part is.

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25814#msg25814

BIG Don Fan · « **Reply #29 on:** June 15, 2007, 07:38:12 PM »

I think that this all has to do with the dude from the Sunset Speedway Forum with reqards to the coat. But then again probably just me trying to stir the pot. You folks have a GREAT weekend out there and race safe!!!

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6091.msg25816#msg25816

CanadianRacingOnline.com

News:

Poll

should tecks uphold the rules