Attention: Guests by accessing CRO, you agree to the site terms. Please read the terms of CRO Click Here

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4

Author Topic: winner weight should we have it or not  (Read 7586 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline #9Chris

  • Series Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 384
  • CHIL Racing
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2007, 10:03:49 PM »
I just want to let every one know that I'm not looking to get heads cut off here but I just want to know that things are far in a class that is very well like at a track that is going to be the best place to race is Ontario for years to come. champions and champions and winners are winners, but every driver in every class has the right to get a taste of what a win feels like. I know that I loved my win saturday night and will always remember it.

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33106#msg33106
Logged
boogity boogity boogity lets go racing boys
Former Driver of the number #9 Thunder Car

CanadianRacingOnline.com

Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2007, 10:03:49 PM »

Offline Kahnefreak

  • Melson Mafia
  • Series Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Melson Racing
    • http://www.piczo.com/gpsracing
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2007, 10:04:19 PM »
winner weight should not be added! i think that if somebody is quicker then tear them don to see if they are legal. if you can't find anything then they should not be penalized. just means everybody else needs to step up their program to make their own cars faster!

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33107#msg33107
Logged
"2nd place is just the first loser"

Offline flybyya8

  • Track Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 219
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2007, 10:06:22 PM »
 Ime not fighting or bad mouthing either Bob & #9, I want to race Barrie next year and just looking into whats going on!! LoL

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33108#msg33108
Logged

CanadianRacingOnline.com

Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2007, 10:06:22 PM »

Offline #9Chris

  • Series Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 384
  • CHIL Racing
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #18 on: September 16, 2007, 10:07:22 PM »
I know that when my car was built we mabe sure that it met all the rules for a nxtgen car. I was very picky about that I never want to give tech something to pick at if I was ever to finish top three in a feature. And yes you can lift the floor on the right side by 10 inches I think.

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33110#msg33110
Logged
boogity boogity boogity lets go racing boys
Former Driver of the number #9 Thunder Car

Offline flybyya8

  • Track Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 219
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #19 on: September 16, 2007, 10:10:21 PM »
 Next gen9, is Norms car that far off of the rules? just wondering.

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33112#msg33112
Logged

Offline Kahnefreak

  • Melson Mafia
  • Series Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Melson Racing
    • http://www.piczo.com/gpsracing
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #20 on: September 16, 2007, 10:11:36 PM »
shouldn't you guys start a new thread? this was suppose to be about winners weight being added and not about who has what in their new generation....not trying to be rude, but when you read a topic it throws you off track when a bunch of unrelated material gets posted!

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33113#msg33113
Logged
"2nd place is just the first loser"

Offline #9Chris

  • Series Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 384
  • CHIL Racing
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #21 on: September 16, 2007, 10:13:23 PM »
flybyya8, I think that norms car was a mix of both nxtgen and old. It used the frame and body from an old school and the tin kit out of a nxt gen.

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33114#msg33114
Logged
boogity boogity boogity lets go racing boys
Former Driver of the number #9 Thunder Car

Offline #9Chris

  • Series Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 384
  • CHIL Racing
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #22 on: September 16, 2007, 10:15:14 PM »
kahnefreak. I can see how this is off topic some what.

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33116#msg33116
Logged
boogity boogity boogity lets go racing boys
Former Driver of the number #9 Thunder Car

Offline Kahnefreak

  • Melson Mafia
  • Series Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Melson Racing
    • http://www.piczo.com/gpsracing
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #23 on: September 16, 2007, 10:16:14 PM »
although I am very interested in new gens (cause my dad is building one for next year) I would be happy to discuss this on a new thread!

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33117#msg33117
Logged
"2nd place is just the first loser"

Offline Tooner

  • Car Owner
  • ****
  • Posts: 117
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #24 on: September 17, 2007, 02:27:16 PM »
"EXEMPTIONS:
• One front lower control arm may modified in length to within 1’ of stock measurement. Other lower control arm must remain stock.
• Any GM stock spindle allowed on GM chassis. Must be used in pairs and must be symmetrical with a maximum rotor thickness of 1”. No mixing allowed.
• Steel braided brake lines allowed.
• Tubular front upper control arms are allowed and must fit stock chassis mounts with no modifications to chassis.
• If stock upper control arms are used, ball joint may be repositioned on flat area of control arm with no other modifications. Stock ball joints only. No truck ball joints allowed.
• Brake proportioning valve allowed. Location is optional.
• Rear upper control arms may be fabricated from steel. Stock length and mounts only. Non adjustable.INTERIOR
All upholstery materials, trim and padding must be removed. The front and rear firewalls must have all holes and openings filled with sheet metal. NO SHEET METALS SCREWS TO BE USED. Pop rivets or welding/brazing only.

Original transmission tunnel and firewalls must be retained. Passenger side floor may start from top of transmission tunnel and run straight across to passenger door and must be made of minimum 22 gauge steel. Seat and seat belts must be firmly mounted to the cage or chassis of the car." Copied and pasted from the Barrie Speedways Thunder Car rules not the Next Gen's.

You have to patch half the firewall on most of these cars on the passenger side where the heater box was  with sheet metal and his is all in the stock position and has the stock trans. tunnel. All was approved by tech! Just in case Dave's motor passed with flying colors this past weekend with room to spare.

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33204#msg33204
« Last Edit: September 17, 2007, 02:35:47 PM by Tooner »
Logged

Offline Kahnefreak

  • Melson Mafia
  • Series Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Melson Racing
    • http://www.piczo.com/gpsracing
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #25 on: September 17, 2007, 02:33:38 PM »
Quote
EXEMPTIONS:
• One front lower control arm may modified in length to within 1’ of stock measurement. Other lower control arm must remain stock.
• Any GM stock spindle allowed on GM chassis. Must be used in pairs and must be symmetrical with a maximum rotor thickness of 1”. No mixing allowed.
• Steel braided brake lines allowed.
• Tubular front upper control arms are allowed and must fit stock chassis mounts with no modifications to chassis.
• If stock upper control arms are used, ball joint may be repositioned on flat area of control arm with no other modifications. Stock ball joints only. No truck ball joints allowed.
• Brake proportioning valve allowed. Location is optional.
• Rear upper control arms may be fabricated from steel. Stock length and mounts only. Non adjustable.

What does this have to do with weight?

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33206#msg33206
Logged
"2nd place is just the first loser"

Offline Tooner

  • Car Owner
  • ****
  • Posts: 117
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #26 on: September 17, 2007, 02:38:10 PM »
Someone made a coment so I made one back thats all!

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33208#msg33208
Logged

Offline Kahnefreak

  • Melson Mafia
  • Series Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Melson Racing
    • http://www.piczo.com/gpsracing
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #27 on: September 17, 2007, 02:56:14 PM »
well i started a thread about new gen and old school thundercar rules!

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33210#msg33210
Logged
"2nd place is just the first loser"

Offline Tooner

  • Car Owner
  • ****
  • Posts: 117
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #28 on: September 17, 2007, 03:02:23 PM »
Join the clud Steve, happens in all the posts on here. Someone makes a comment and it requires an answer.

Linkback: https://www.canadianracingonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=6714.msg33212#msg33212
Logged

Offline Kahnefreak

  • Melson Mafia
  • Series Owner
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Melson Racing
    • http://www.piczo.com/gpsracing
Re: winner weight should we have it or not
« Reply #29 on: September 17, 2007, 03:21:11 PM »
Logged
"2nd place is just the first loser"
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
« previous next »
 

HTML ezBlock
site stats
Powered by EzPortal